|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
September 8, 2011
Passing Thoughts on Obama, Bloomberg, & Jobs
I was thinking... Tonight is Presdident Obama's latest most important speech on jobs. I've lost count, though I think the over-under
is 10, so I'll take the over. This speech was labled as big and dramatic before the President went on vacation to Martha's
Vineyard. By now of course, we already know the contents of the speech, and Obama and his team have been attempting
to lower expectations all week long. We're going to get the same old rhetoric of infrastructure bank, middle class tax
breaks, and another effort at juicing home sales and assuring that those who should have never got a loan to buy a home, get
to stay in their home on the back of future US taxpayers. Nothing the President says tonight will change the near-term
economic outlook. The President will use the word "inherited" early, and more than once. This is
a camapign speech. The President will be doing the teleprompter-robotic head swivel we've grown very accustomed
to. The Democrats will be standing in ovation many more times than the Republicans. Tomorrow, the long-term structural
and frictional constraints on US economic prosperity will still be in place, and focus will immediately turn back to
the Republican primary race and the super-committee in Congress. Then I was thinking... Mayor Mike Bloomberg makes it
hard to be proud of the long delayed rebuilding of the World Trade Center (WTC). First, no religion at the 10 year anniversary
celebration. Remarkable! This is plain old political calculus, and in keeping with the long-run effort on the
Left to squash Christianity. Some think he is doing this to avoid the messiness of having Imam's present. My guess
is, knowing what I know of Bloomberg and the Left, it is just as likely it is about reducing the trappings of Christianity
at the memorial. We must not offend Muslims. Second, he tells us we can no longer refer to the WTC cite
as "Ground Zero." Is it now clear to all Mike Bloomberg would much prefer a Dictatorship? He
is constantly scolding New Yorkers, and Americans generally, telling us how to live and talk. I
don't live in NYC anymore, but even I'm anxious for this man's term to end. One more thought... Here is a plan to offer the
President, if he has time to rewrite his speech, that would result in a near-term boost in job creation. First, permanently
(read for as long as that can be for DC) cut the tax rate on overseas earnings of US multi-nationals to something
between 8-15%. Second, cut the corporate tax rate to 22% while closing loopholes and giveaways. Third, cut the
payroll tax for both employees and employers by 5% for all brackets. These measures, absent any spending cuts,
would result in an increase in the federal deficit and debt in the short-run. That's OK, for now.
Better reducing revenue than raising spending. Beyond these few simple steps, in the medium to long-term, we must address
US trade policy; particularly with China, immigration policy, education policy, we must address the regulatory burden
imposed on business, and of course reduce government deficits and debt. Just thinking...
1:41 pm edt
September 6, 2011
The Left Should Be Collectively Embarrassed
Since the US Congress went on recess in July, there has been a wave
of unusual symbolically violent language directed towards Americans who would place themself under the "Tea Party"
umbrella. The Congressional Black caucus has been especially vitriolic in their rhetoric connecting "Tea Party"
Americans directly to desire for the return of slavery, lynchings, Jim Crow, and otherwise basically consumed with
repressing Blacks in America. From the strong message of "GO TO HELL!," to the "They
want to see us swinging from trees," the message is clear: Americans who align themselves with the
"Tea Party" are racists; plain and simple.
Keeping with what appears to be a coordinated
campaign strategy for maligning the power of "Tea Party" Americans, Teamsters President Jimmy Hoffa took the
rhetoric to even higher levels of violent symbolism, invoking war as the metaphor.
Hoffa says:
"We got to keep an eye on the battle that we face:
The war on workers. And you see it everywhere, it is the Tea Party. And you know, there is only one way to beat and win that
war. The one thing about working people is we like a good fight. And you know what? They've got a war, they got a war with
us and there's only going to be one winner. It's going to be the workers of Michigan, and America. We're going to win that
war..."
He continued...
"President
Obama, this is your army. We are ready to march. Let's take these son of bitches out and give America back to an America where
we belong
How does this line up for Mr. Hope & Change and the new tone of civility in DC? Hoffa
was introducing our President with this phrasing. President Obama walked to the same podium offering thanks and praise
to union leaders, including Jimmy Hoffa, who had just offended at least half the nation. No rebuke from President Obama.
"Sticks & Stone will break my bones, but names will never hurt me" does apply here
as always. However, when you combine yesterday's abrasive rhetoric, the verbal attacks by the Black caucus
while on congressional break, with the violent rhetoric coming from Left leaning groups like Move On.Org and
Code Pink and their plans for "days of rage" against Wall St and the institutions of government in DC
this fall, the rest of America must take notice and stand up in opposition to such strategy.
The Left, excepting all those involved in the coordinated effort at stoking violence with the "Tea
Party," should be hanging their collective head in shame today. Does the Left really believe a strategy
of violence keeps them in power? No one on the Left or Right escapes national collapse. If we keep the
policies of the past 45 years in place much longer, add in Union and Black violence, collapse will be inevitable.
Time is still on our side. Mr. President, stand up against this vile talk.
Ps:
yes, similar rhetoric from the Right would also be bad and unwelcome.
3:43 pm edt
September 1, 2011
Obama Admin Blocks AT&T Bid For T-Mobile
The US company AT&T wants to buy T-Mobile, the US subsidiary of
Deutsche Telecom from Germany. Deutsche Telecom is a government controlled company. The German federal government
controls over 30 percent of the company. The Germany company gained a foothold in the US wireless market in 2000 when
they took-over the US company, VoiceStream Wireless in a $51b deal. At the time the deal was announced in July of 2000
the German government owned 58 percent of Deutsche Telecom. As many as 30 US Senators raised concern about the deal
on national security grounds, calling for the Clinton Administration to step in.
The deal went through,
and a vital US asset fell into the hands of a foreign government.
Here we are today, AT&T, an American
company, has an opportunity to buy T-Mobile from Deutsche Telecom, returning an American asset back under control of an American
controlled company, and the Obama administration wants to block the deal on the grounds of competition and consumer prices.
If that happens, you can be sure another foreign controlled company will swoop in and buy T-Mobile, assuring for some more
time into the future, a vital American asset remains in foreign hands.
Does it matter? Yes, it should
matter to all patriotic Americans. For more than 30 years now, to our long-term detriment, American companies have
been picked over by the rest of the world.
Since 1980, foreign companies have gained control of:
Nearly 100 percent of all US telephone exchange and billing services Nearly 100 percent of the US consumer electronics
industry Nearly 100 percent of the US photo imaging industry Nearly 100 percent of the US luxury good manufacturers/retailers The majority of the US book and magazine publishing industry The majority of the US music recording industry The majority of US heavy truck manufacturing The majority of US tire manufacturers Nearly half of the major US
oil & gas companies Large segments of the US food distribution industry Large segments of the US water
distribution utilities Large segments of the US major motion picture industry
We should be thinking America
First. We should be thinking Always Try To Buy American
10:11 am edt
August 16, 2011
WORRY ABOUT CHINA FOR THE RIGHT REASONS
There is a good deal of angst among ordinary Americans when it comes to China: they're
hearing a lot about China financing the US government, the strength of the Chinese economy and impressive growth rates three
times that of the US. Americans hear about ongoing outsourcing of American manufacturing jobs, and an increasingly stronger
Chinese military.
There is little doubt China does present a challenge for the American economy and
America's dominant role in the world.
We have legitimate concerns to address relating to China.
However, it is important these concerns are put in some perspective that can help Americans sleep a bit
better. First, China financing the US government, and second, the size and strength of the Chinese economy.
If you're only source of economic information is the television or USA today, by now you've been sufficiently
convinced China funds the lions share of US government borrowing, and China's economy is bigger and stronger than ours.
Without China-America collapses-is about the tone right now among the MSM.
It's not
true. The data is available for all to look at. Visit, www.treasury.gov/tic, you can see for
yourself.
Total US Treasury debt outstanding is approximately $14.56 trillion ($9.9t held by public,
$4.66t US intra-governmental). China (including Hong Kong), is the largest foreign holder of US Treasury
securities at approximately $1.284 trillion. Doing some simple math reveals China owns 8.8% of total debt outstanding,
and 12.9% of debt held by the public.
These are not small numbers to be sure. But, they
do not at all suggest the US government is uniquely dependent on China to finance our on-going indebtedness. Total
foreign holdings account for 30 percent of US debt outstanding. The top ten foreign holders of treasury securities
are China, Japan (6%), United Kingdom (2.4%), Brazil (1.4%), Taiwan (1%), Russia
(.7%), Switzerland (.7%), Canada (.6%), Luxembourg (.5%), and Thailand (.4%).
Most US debt is held domestically, with the Federal Reserve being the largest holder.
If China unexpectedly
decided to dump their holdings of US Treasury securities tomorrow, assuming no exogenous event, there would be some panic,
interest rates would spike, the media would go into a frenzy, though it would not come close to collapsing the US government.
There is sufficient demand to buy up China's Treasury holdings.
Why do foreign nationals own our debt? Because we are the United States of America. While we
have problems, and our system has flaws, it is still the best organizing system for a society compared to all others. US
Treasury securities are the safest place to have big chunks of money, and will be for a long time to come.
As for the size of China's economy, don't believe the hype. Last year it was announced China overcame
Japan to become the 2nd largest economy in the world. Some simple math, assuming constant growth rates, indicates Chinese
economic output for 2011 could reach $5.78 trillion, just 38 percent of total US output for 2011 ($15 trillion).
Assuming a constant growth rate of 2 percent per year for the US economy, and 8 percent per year for the Chinese
economy, it will take China another 17 years to surpass the size of the US in economic output. Of course,
that simple analysis assumes many important things, and extrapolation is a dangerous science. We can rest
assured, growth rates of neither country will not be constant for 18 years.
To view
the competition on a per capita basis, America shines even brighter. Per capita GDP for the US in 2011 is approximately
$48,231.00. Per capita GDP for China in 2011 is approximately $5,254.00, just 10.8 percent of the US. China
would need annual output to reach $53 trillion dollars to match US per capita GDP of 2011. If all went perfectly for
China, assuming no growth in population, that wouldn't be until 2041.
China could overtake
the US, or perhaps not. China has bigger internal problems than we do, not to mention they're a Communist nation.
So, don't worry about Chinese purchases of US debt, nor the size of the Chinese economy...for now.
You want to worry about China?
Worry about the daily manipulation of their currency to the detriment
of the US exporter and worker. Worry about the trade deal Bill Clinton signed with the Chinese in 2000
and the resulting US trade deficit with the Communist nation going from $83 billion in 2001, to $240 billion in 2011.
Worry about their "merchantilist" trading ways.
Worry about China's ongoing military buildup across the Taiwan Straights for
the purpose of assuring Taiwan is brought back under control of China when they're ready. Worry about China's
massive military buildup and the impact on the balance of power in the South China Sea in an effort to push America out.
Worry about China's control of both ends of the Panama Canal. Worry about China's lack of willingness to stop
the nuclear ambitions of North Korea and Iran.
You can worry about American Elites who look to China
as the model for how government can control a society--Communism with a touch of market economics. Worry China is a Communist
country, and the increasing likelihood that the plan by American Elites to redistribute our wealth to China so her
citizens will throw off the shackles of Communism is going to fail.
As a country,
we need to put China in the proper perspective, for she is rising up to challenge America, and she is being helped along by
Americans in government and the boardrooms of US multi-nationals. With the right American citizens making
policy decisions in DC we can still assure American dominance for generations to come. It starts with an end to
the daily manipulation of the Yuan, trade re-negotiations, and some hard Geo-political decisions.
10:58 am edt
August 9, 2011
FALLING STOCK PRICES, THE FED, & AA+ AMERICA
For average Americans with a 401k or an investment
account, big sell-offs in the equity markets (think S&P 500 rather than Dow) can be emotionally wrenching.
Stocks were off 7% last week, with one big day sell-off of 3% on Thursday, and another similar drop on Monday. In
moments like this the talking heads always focus on the individual investor and tend to ratchet up the anxiety as a result.
Just think back to 2008/09, the same anxiety was emphasized. It is easy to lose sleep when your investments are
in the red..."If only I had just kept my money in the bank...or bought gold?"
There are a
few simple things you can do to prepare yourself during unusually volatile moments in financial markets.
Read your financial statements: know what you're invested in, know what the original price of your investments
were, know when and how often you can buy or sell (especially important with a 401k), and any penalties/fees
that may be associated. Know the value of your investments based on current market prices.
Set a stop
loss: one of the key disciplines for any trader/investor is to set a stop-loss. The stop-loss is the price
you set to exit a position because you've lost as much money as you're willing to lose. The risk/reward ratio is
in play here. How much did you intend to make on any given trade/investment? It should be greater than the
amount your are willing to lose on the trade/investment. If you have $2,000 invested, with a profit goal of
20% ($400.00), then your stop loss should be something less than 20%.
If you use a
broker, keep in regular contact during periods of high volatility and unusual levels of uncertainty, like now. Give
your stop-loss informtation to your broker.
Beyond these simple steps, it all depends on your
own individual intestinal fortitude as to how comfortably you sleep at night. Regardless, at moments
like this, you must pay greater attention. --------------------
The Fed has a
policy meeting today, Tuesday, August, 9th. Markets are not expecting any change in policy, though are expecting some change
in the statement for any indication as to when rates will begin to move higher. Or, though hopefully not,
any indication the Fed plans another round of quantitative easing (QE3). We need the Fed to stand
pat for a while. Many are calling for more Fed action...we don't want anymore Fed action. They've done all
they can for now.
------------------------
Lastly, take note. The
S&P downgrade is not a downgrade of America, it is a downgrade of US government debt indicating a marginally higher
probability that the debt may not be payed back. This is not a downgrade of America. It is a shot
at our collective pride for sure, though not a downgrade of America. The American economy and quality of life
is much bigger than government. While local, state, and federal government has been unceasingly expanding,
American real GDP excluding government at $10.7 trillion still keeps America the largest economy in the world.
Stay strong, we can overcome.
9:12 am edt
|
|
|
2011.09.01 |
2011.08.01 |
2011.07.01 |
2011.06.01 |
2011.05.01 |
2011.03.01 |
2011.02.01 |
2011.01.01 |
2010.12.01 |
2010.11.01 |
2010.10.31 |
2010.10.17 |
2010.10.10 |
2010.10.03 |
2010.09.26 |
2010.09.19 |
2010.09.12 |
2010.08.29 |
2010.08.01

|
Enter content here
|
 |
|
Enter content here
|
 |
|
Enter content here
|
 |
|
Enter content here
|
|
|
Enter supporting content here
|
|
|
 |